Fuck it. I decided to compile a list of every change between Season 2 and Blood of Elves

Heavy spoilers for the books and Season 2!

\---------------------------------------------------------------

This is not all-encompassing. I'll forget some changes--Heaven knows the writers made enough changes. I'll also preface this by saying: This isn't a commentary on the quality of the season itself. It is simply a collection of the differences between the novel and the show.

**Characters**

* Voleth Meir is not in the books. Completely new character.

* Geralt wouldn't use Ciri as bait in the books. Nor did he.

* Ciri is never possessed by a witch.

* Yennefer does not lose her magic in the books.

* Yennefer never considers sacrificing Ciri for power. Nor does the opportunity ever arise.

* Yennefer is not captured by Niilfgard in the books.

* Instead, she is blinded following Sodden after taking a fireball to the face from Fringilla. She then spends lots of time in recovery, then--on Dijkstra's orders--tails and saves Dandelion from Rience.

* No one ever thinks she's dead in the books either (Geralt worries that she died after Sodden, if I recall, but finds out rather quickly she's still out there after talking to Triss at the Sodden memorial)

* Later in the series (Post Time of Contempt/Late Season 3 or early Season 4 by comparison), people suspect Yennefer of being a Nilfgaardian spy. But at no point does anyone suspect her of being a spy following Sodden.

* The Stregobor stuff isn't a thing in the books. He's there, but plays no important role.

* Vessemir wouldn't try to use Ciri's blood to create more witchers in the books. Nor would he ever allow Ciri to undergo the Trial. Nor would he let Eskel bring a bunch of hookers to Kaer Morhen

* In the books, Dandelion is actively working with Djikstra and the Redanian Secret Service. ~~This is removed in the show~~ It is implied that Djikstra is funding Dandelion's sandpiper activities, though Dandelion doesn't seem to be aware of who he is working with. This is speculative on my part though.

* Also in the books, Dandelion is not nearly as comedic as he was in Season 2. He is funny, but they seemed to lean into that aspect of him for Season 2.

* This is more my interpretation, but in the books, Dandelion is far wittier than he is in the show. He certainly doesn't come across as the type to talk to rats in the book.

* Djikstra is not a rambling drunk in the books (although I didn't find that to be a bad change. It was pretty interesting IMO).

* I don't believe Istredd even appears in Blood of Elves

* Francesa Findabar is *not* with the Scoia'tael in the books. By this, I mean she's not in the field with them, acting as their leader.

* She is a member of the Brotherhood of Sorcerers, though she does harbor sympathies for their cause and occasionally meets with Scoia'tel leaders (Filavandrel, as an example). This relationship becomes relevant when she aids Niilfgaard during the Coup at Thanned

* Fringilla Vigo does not become de facto leader of Cintra in the books. Instead, she fucks off to Niilfgard

* Cahir is not captured by the Brotherhood following Sodden in the books. I don't even recall if he was at Sodden. As far as I recall, he traveled back to Niilfgard following the Fall of Cintra, and was imprisoned for failing to capture Ciri. We don't see him again for another two books after Sodden.

* His execution plot-point never happened in the books.

* Book Cahir is also not nearly as mustache-twirly-evil-villain as he is in the show. Cahir fans will know what I mean.

* Tissaia is hardly a significant character in the books.

* Rience is not a magical bounty hunter in the books. He's an almost fanatical follower of Vilgefortz in the books.

* Rience is scarred in the show and books, but in the books, it's because Yennefer uses her magic to wound him as he's interrogating Dandelion.

* Lydia Van Bredevoort does not develop her scars from sniffing a vial of elder blood in the books. Instead, her scars are a result of magical experimentation on Vilgefortz' orders, and her wounds are hidden with an illusion.

* Eskel is not turned into a Leshen and then killed (as far as we know. He's not in the books for long.)

* Vilgefortz and Tissaia are not a romantic thing, as far as I could tell. Nor are they really even partners. Vilgefortz is also the genuine champion of Sodden in the books. He does this to gain more authority in the Brotherhood.

* Vilgy is also way stronger and smarter in the books then how he is depicted in the show. Also, Vilgy never says his classic line. This is a cardinal sin, imo.

* Nenekke is an old and religious lady. She doesn't go around dropping f-bombs in the books.

* Emhyr kept the fact that Ciri was his daughter a big secret in the books. Understandable, given his plans for her (**cough** Imperial Incest **cough**)

* Jarre in the books is a bit of a geek, who is very clearly awkward around girls, and has a crush on Ciri. But he's also smart, and good-intentioned. The show reduces him to a dick joke.

**Plot Points**

* Except for Ciri's training, there is not a single fight at Kaer Morhen. Never. There is no Leshen, nor is there the centipede thing with the claws. There is no possession.

* There are only four witchers at Kaer Morhen (Vessemir, Eskel, Lambert, and Coen)

* At Kaer Morhen, Ciri trains and exercises. Eventually, Triss arrives (on Geralt's request) and instructs Ciri on the basics of magic, as well as the Elder language.

* The plot point with Ciri's blood being able to make more witchers is not in the books.

* Vesemir never collects her blood either. The thought of making more witchers is only ever entertained in the context of Ciri being raised as a girl vs. being raised as a witcher. But the mutagenic process itself/Trial of Grasses is never brought up.

* In the book, Triss travels with Ciri and Geralt to the Temple. In the show, she doesn't. We don't see her get sick.

* On the path to the Temple is when they run into Yarpen Zigrin again. This doesn't happen in the show. As a result, Ciri doesn't visit Shaerrawedd, and there is no fight with the Scoia'tael.

* There is no fight at Melitele's Temple in the books. Never.

* Yennefer does not travel to the Temple to kidnap Ciri and sacrifice her in the books.

* In the books, Ciri and Yennefer stay at the temple for a while. Ciri learns more magic.

* Yennefer is invited to the temple by Geralt after Geralt has already left. See the 'Dear Friend,' bullet point further down.

* There is no reunion between Geralt and Yennefer in Blood of Elves. They reunite outside Gors Velen in the next book.

* In the books, Rience does not find Ciri at the Temple. Instead, Geralt leaves Ciri in Nenekke's care to find Rience at Oxenfurt.

* There is no Shani in the show. >:(

* Phillipa does not help Geralt find Rience, nor does she help Rience escape: as she does in the books.

* In fact, Rience doesn't meet Ciri till the Time of Contempt, which is the next book following Blood of Elves.

* Dandelion doesn't sing at a tavern in Oxenfurt. He sings at Bleobheris, a sacred tree.

* His Sandpiper plot is not a thing in the books.

* Dandelion is not arrested in the books.

* The elf and Cintra plot is not in the books.

* There is a non-human uprising in the North in the books, led by the Scoia'tael, but they are not given Cintra as a place of refuge by the Niilfgardians. Instead, Niilfgard is suspected of funding and arming them behind the scenes to stoke instability in the North.

* Francesca never gets pregnant. Nor does Emhyr commit infanticide against an elven baby in the books.

* The notion that a pure-blooded elf hasn't been born in decades is also a Netflix invention. Elves have a much smaller window of time to get pregnant, but it still happens in the books. Avallach and Geralt talk about this in Tower of Swallow.

* The magical politics is a thing in the books, but is very different from the magical politics in the show. Stregobor does not interrogate or harm Yennefer, and neither do Tissaia/Vilgy use that as an excuse to seize Council seats.

* Instead, the magical politics in the book are concerned with the growing distrust between the Kings and their magical advisors

* The meeting of the Kings at the end of Season 2 is the meeting of the Kings in BoE that puts the Mages on edge, and is used to justify the Conclave in Time of Contempt. However, Tissaia is at the King's meeting in the show, which is not the case in the book. No mages were invited to the meeting in the books.

* When the Kings of the North meet, they do conclude it best to kill Ciri--so as to prevent her falling into Emhyr's hands (they don't want him to have a legitimate claim to the Cintran throne). However, the show cut the King's talk of war with Niilfgaard.

* In the books, they believe a quick strike across the Yaruga could recapture Cintra, and deal a blow to the South. This conversation paves the way for the Second Great War, but does not happen in the show.

* The show also leaves out the politics regarding Cintra's throne. Cordhingrer is visited by Geralt in the books, and they develop a plot to--essentially-- smear Calanthe's name and ruin her claim to the Cintrant throne, thus making Ciri's claim to the throne illegitimate. Thus, protecting her from the kings who want her dead for her political power.

* Again, the Voleth Meir plot is not in the books at all. Instead, Blood of Elves focuses on Ciri's training and planting the seeds for future conflicts.

* I.e. the Second Great War, the Coup of Thanned, Character's motivations to capture Ciri, etc.

* The Monoliths are not a thing in the books.

* The 'Dear Friend,' bit is in reference to letters exchanged by Yennefer and Geralt while Geralt is in Oxenfurt hunting for Rience. Geralt asks Yennefer to travel to the temple to train Ciri. Again, Geralt and Yen don't actually meet though.

* In the books, Niilfgardians are depicted as something more akin to the Romans or English (Highly centralized government with progressive and aristocratic traditions and legal codes). In the books, they are not religious zealots. Though they are also not necessarily 'good' either.

* Yennefer and Cahir never have a team-up in the books.

* Tissaia does not recommend that Ciri be captured, nor does she suggest that anyone protecting her be captured as well. In fact, Tissaia's role in the show is dramatically overblown.

* Ciri is not with Geralt when he meets Nivellen.

* Istredd does not meet with Cordringer and Fenn in the books. Geralt does meet them to find information about Rience and Ciri.

It's not an exaggeration to say that the *majority* of this season is different from the books. And not just sort of different, but drastically different. Hell, the last four or five episodes are fictitious (relative to the book canon (yes I know it's all fiction, please stop reminding me)) in nearly every way. At this point, I'm not certain where the story will go. For example, how will the Coup play out on Thanedd if Ciri won't be able to attend it? And if Ciri isn't at Aretuza for the Coup, then how will she be warped to the desert? And if she isn't separated from Geralt and Yennefer, then how will she meet up with the Rats?

Obviously, they can still work these plots in, or at least, work in the *effects* of these plots, but the story will take a drastically different turn than the one the book tells.

Note that this isn't necessarily a good or a bad thing, so long as it's done well. But there has to come a point when the adaptation is so drastically different from the source material, that I start to wonder whether it's truly an adaptation, or if it's a reimagining.

椰奶和特莉絲換成她們倆來演怎么樣？椰奶和特莉絲換成她們倆來演怎么樣？椰奶和特莉絲換成她們倆來演怎么樣？椰奶和特莉絲換成她們倆來演怎么樣？椰奶和特莉絲換成她們倆來演怎么樣？椰奶和特莉絲換成她們倆來演怎么樣？椰奶和特莉絲換成她們倆來演怎么樣？椰奶和特莉絲換成她們倆來演怎么樣？椰奶和特莉絲換成她們倆來演怎么樣？

看到S2E2終于覺得不對，忍不住了。我可真是后知后覺。

先來說說第一部的優(yōu)點，有幾處精彩的打戲，有幾處精彩的改編，雖然肉眼可見的低成本，但盡最大誠意還原了該有的大場景；雖然因為劇情容量所限，削減了部分角色劇情，但好在敘事手法應(yīng)用得當(dāng)頗具新意。

那么好了，第二部給了我們什么？

在北方諸國出現(xiàn)了完全兩樣的氣候，一邊下暴風(fēng)，一邊樹木長青。你當(dāng)這是西伯利亞和地中海諸國嗎？——行，為了塑造不同的情緒，勉強能接受。

理論上最少最少要花半個月時間（即使不討論背景設(shè)定，現(xiàn)實里跨越氣候帶的路程會很短嗎），杰洛特和希里還是單衣最多加個裘?！校芭锱膽虼┨?，太熱了出汗就出戲了，勉強接受。

一隊精靈貴族難民（甚至不是松鼠黨，這有本質(zhì)區(qū)別，不論是戰(zhàn)斗風(fēng)格還是嗜血程度二者都完全不同），用莫名其妙的大粗木頭尖子捅死一隊尼弗迦德指揮官小隊并俘虜了兩個女術(shù)士（甚至還要在后面幻境里圓一下，葉奈法失去了力量）——行，節(jié)省成本降低非主線的打斗預(yù)算，勉強接受。甚至你整個葉奈法線都是拙劣的謎語人戲碼也無所謂。懸疑嘛，稍微調(diào)節(jié)調(diào)節(jié)氣氛。

第一集的主線膚淺，別扭，我聽說獵魔人的編劇既看不起游戲也看不起原著，那么怎么能寫出這種劣質(zhì)驚悚片套愛情片的劇本。 刻意創(chuàng)造疑點，又刻意讓主人公不在乎。明明前面的劇情已經(jīng)在兇案現(xiàn)場卻刻意忽略線索，都到了怪物居所獵魔人的嗅覺、聽覺甚至視覺統(tǒng)統(tǒng)失效，還非得回現(xiàn)場一趟，作一番拙劣的推理（能飛的怪物可多了，而且沒有白天出沒和仔細觀察尸體傷口的細節(jié)根本推理不出什么東西）。 ——行，我可以催眠自己杰洛特是顧及希里安全沒有下馬探查，大雪天影響了獵魔人感官。這是動作片不是偵探片，可以可以勉強接受。

還有劇情改編，是原著不行嗎。不是，是編劇駕馭不了原著的深度不敢討論人性的陰暗面，是劇方為了收視率刻意選擇了俗套。這是獵魔人？這不是合家歡迪士尼樂園？ ——當(dāng)然，至少還算像人寫出來的東西，也不是不能看。把原作中直到收到委托才去擊殺吸血女妖的杰洛特，改編成站在人類一方，即使明知納維倫的意愿仍然揮劍的“正義”騎士，也不是不行。大眾就好這口，勉強接受。

但是第二集是什么玩意兒？演員新冠??了換演員我可以理解，但是從妝容、性格、演員模樣，這完完全全就是蘭伯特。艾斯卡爾會帶妓女上山？我一開始還以為我認錯人了。 且不論這個林地矮妖和斯拉夫傳說里的沒半毛錢關(guān)系，其本身也不存在什么寄生轉(zhuǎn)化這種和設(shè)定自相矛盾的能力，為什么會讓艾斯卡爾被寄生，讓他被殺死？編劇是這樣表示的：通過親近之人的死，讓杰洛特迅速理解到保護希里的重要性。 我說編劇是不是有病，我可太知道編劇是什么想法了：艾斯卡爾的演員換人了，暫時找不到合適的演員，那干脆就然這個角色下線；但是后面可能還需要一個類似艾斯卡爾的角色，怎么辦呢，就讓表現(xiàn)令人厭煩的、不好臉譜化的、主流觀眾不一定喜歡的蘭伯特，去死吧你，然后讓蘭伯特這個角色取代艾斯卡爾的位置，讓他變成溫柔玩世不恭的游俠形象吧，這一波偷梁換柱我簡直是天才。

………………

傻逼。

………………對不起我一般不在網(wǎng)上罵人但是我忍不住了。

游戲里，艾斯卡爾也有一個意外率獲得的命運之女——戴德莉·阿德梅恩。你改編成艾斯卡爾被戴德莉殺了或者他殺了命運之女，又或者他回到凱爾莫罕聽其他獵魔人說戴德莉政變失敗失蹤了，然后不顧風(fēng)雪去尋找她，不是能達到差不多的效果？你們這還擱那演動作戲，演演演，演砍艾斯卡爾（蘭伯特）的戲碼，葉奈法都被人PUA了還擱這動作戲。原本演員可以來的時候準備怎么拍？那個時候就準備吧艾斯卡爾搞死了？還是說原本準備搞死蘭伯特，因為這個演員原本是演蘭伯特的？因為他原本就該死所以沒簽長約，找來的蘭伯特的演員才貼近艾斯卡爾的形象因為他就是來演艾斯卡爾的劇本的？

還有妓女來的時候維瑟米爾不出來阻止，杰洛特來阻止？？希里到凱爾莫罕沒人驚訝就算了，你還要等蘭伯特——我不管那就是蘭伯特——進門問了才來個亮明身份。太弱智了，這都不是弱智劇情，這純粹是犯低級錯誤，從剪輯邏輯上就是完完全全不合理的。導(dǎo)演編劇至少有一個要背鍋。“蘭伯特演員是臨時找的，這一段是補拍”這種理由我才不接受。

有些觀眾似乎很喜歡這一季啊，拿IMDB分數(shù)和爛番茄新鮮度還有豆瓣作證。但是不論是爛番茄爆米花指數(shù)60分不到，MC用戶分不到4分，還是最重要的一點，所有平臺的評論數(shù)量都銳減至少一半，都說明了第二季爛爛爛爛上加爛。

還有一些為政治正確辯駁的用戶

第一位在為政治正確辯駁

第二位腦子不好使，搞不清第一位說的什么，更搞不清種族歧視

第一季拍的還行，某些角色被邊緣化了，換外貌不那么出眾的和黑人演員沒關(guān)系，印裔的葉奈法在第一季演技還不錯所以都可以容忍，但這可不是什么值得稱道的事。

什么才是真正的反對種族歧視？ 是實打?qū)嵉恼宫F(xiàn)北境王國對精靈和矮人的種族仇殺 是不將歧視和非我族類弱化成王國紛爭的人類與精靈王國的矛盾 是將血淋淋的現(xiàn)實不加粉飾的展現(xiàn)在人們面前 而不是用就業(yè)公平這種由頭硬塞黑人演員的做法 白人和部分傻傻的黑人才吃這一套，這樣一來不但減緩了黑人的反抗意識，也把白人內(nèi)部（甚至其他少數(shù)族裔）的就業(yè)矛盾轉(zhuǎn)移到黑人身上 劇組敢改編一個史凱力根乘船去南方掠奪黑人奴隸或者尼弗迦德征召黑人奴隸上前線的戲碼嗎？ 敢在劇中放人類對亞人種族慘無人道的火刑架和松鼠黨報復(fù)性的割喉謀殺嗎？ 甚至，劇組敢在劇里加上一段嘲諷亞人種族的童謠嗎？

原作表達的類似于“人類之間不論有什么矛盾，其他種族怪物都不過是人類的工具，也許可能是人類的伙伴，但永遠不會是人類，不論是精靈、矮人、獵魔人還是怪物?！彪娨晞±镉谐霈F(xiàn)一點點嗎？為什么我上面提到“即使明知納維倫的意愿仍然揮劍的‘正義’騎士”，因為真正的獵魔人基本不會為了委托之外原因去獵殺魔物，除非跟獵魔人自己切身相關(guān)，又或者擋住他的路。獵魔人的世界里又各種不同的倫理，獵魔人的倫理，女術(shù)士的倫理，精靈的倫理，德魯伊的倫理，吸血鬼的倫理，人類的倫理，人類的倫理里面還有史凱力根這種和大陸不同的倫理。電視劇有真正去塑造這些不同的倫理嗎？還不是一筆帶過或者臉譜化處理。這叫什么，這叫美國主義。

我在這放兩部劇，真正做到了對政治正確的正面探討《杰克萊恩（第一季）》《副本（第一季）》對，都只有一季，為什么只有一季值得稱道那就去問美國人。 為什么酷兒不再是酷的，為什么平權(quán)流于表面不再敢于深入，為什么好的創(chuàng)作者和創(chuàng)作方向不再能獲得資源，都去問美國人。不是只有天朝的文娛在走下坡路。沃卓斯基拍不了8被迫去拍黑4，都是一個道理。

就那么一點點價值觀的沖突，還依賴著原著，為什么不能用珠玉在前的原著和游戲來對比電視?。?甚至脫開前者，電視劇的水平也就將將二流，比CW超英劇強點的水平。爛番茄新鮮度90%就吹吧，真是一等一水平亨利會直接辭演而不是錯開檔期？

平心而論，第一季我會給4星，第二季我會給2~3星，但是就像馮小剛說的——雖然他不一定對—— “有很多垃圾觀眾，才形成了這么多的垃圾電影。你如果不去捧場，它就沒有生存空間，制片人也不會去制作這些垃圾電影?！?Netflix里我vote down，豆瓣我也要打一星，這才是真正尊重影視作品。

第一季最后，出人意料得把巫師故事原本的史詩感、傳奇性拍了出來，這一季開篇也有很大的進步，就在我以為可以延續(xù)下去的時候：糟糕至極的改編，又莫明其妙得把大量應(yīng)該慢慢說清楚的故事冗雜在了后半段，還把咱們大名鼎鼎的布拉維坎屠夫、白狼、利維亞的杰洛特拍得肉麻話滿天，獵魔人原本對情緒的壓抑、深沉雄厚的情感以及冷靜的幽默恰好是他們的魅力。 原作的迷人之處，本該是用一個個充斥幽秘、用魔法與鮮血跟幽暗森林打交道的冒險經(jīng)歷，所給觀眾帶來的代入感，以及用幾位人物復(fù)雜的情感、成長故事來貫穿了整個大陸的歷史，所帶來的厚重感，可惜這些都被劇里像被鞭子抽一樣的劇情推動毀掉了。 原作中，正如geralt的信條一樣，他不愿踏入歷史漩渦，所以永遠是以他的故事為主，著力點在充滿怪物的小道上，但同時又如他總是不自覺已經(jīng)踏入了漩渦一樣，他是這片大陸歷史推動的重要一環(huán)，大故事就被側(cè)面渲染了出來。相比冰與火之歌，巫師不愿正面描述權(quán)力的博弈，geralt犀利干脆、洞悉萬物，但也是個粗人、享受在沼澤地里與野獸廝殺，遠沒那個耐心染指政治，他是個傳奇、但同樣是個小人物。

其實巫師拍得好，遠比權(quán)游吸引人(其實第一季后半段，第二季前半段，路子已經(jīng)走對了，并且非常精彩：個體的故事、命運的交匯、歷史的推動，也是原著的玩法。但其他部分，不知道是沒錢了，還是編劇腦子抽了，或是單純沒耐心拍了，非常糟糕得添油加醋、直白得敘述各種政治事件，還把這么多的概念和人物全盤托出，哪怕對我這種看過小說、玩了好幾遍游戲的觀眾來說，也非常不友好)。 波蘭人可是把巫師當(dāng)國寶，能不能不要暴殄天物呀。

申明：巫師3含DLC全通，但小說沒看。

先說優(yōu)點：

1.動作場面確實不錯，大量和怪物打斗的場面完成得非常出色，作為一部動作片是過癮的。但是貫穿全劇的最終Boss，每次出場都頗為故弄玄虛，云里霧里的，算是小失誤。

2. 第一集改編得確實不錯，有黑童話那味道，故事相對獨立，算是一個優(yōu)秀的把人騙進去宰的材料。

3. 如果巫師3玩家來我這里想和我一起噴“好萊塢選角的zzzq”那我不奉陪，我覺得膚色不是問題，選角上，Ciri，Yen和Triss的選角沒有問題。尤其是Triss這季妝造大大改良了，好看了不少。而這季的新選角里老爺子和菲麗芭非常優(yōu)秀，而迪胖被大大地美化了一把。

4. 優(yōu)點這一欄，“亨利卡維爾”五個字值得單列并且大書特書他的好，以下省略一萬字彩虹屁。這劇的評分只有三星，剩下的兩星是給亨利卡的。

話說回缺點，我最不滿的在于，把人物性格和關(guān)系完全寫崩了。

為了襯托Ciri的成長線，她身邊所有人都有一定程度的扭曲，葉奈法會有背刺Ciri的想法，老爺子猶豫不決決斷力連Ciri都不如，而杰洛特為了Ciri把劍拍椰奶脖子上的場面真的是讓我翻白眼…

最可怕的是，經(jīng)過了這樣的一個扭曲地調(diào)整，居然還有點自圓其說地圓回來了，但是格局小了很多很多。獵魔人的世界里那么一點溫暖善良的角落，那些可愛的人，都變得小家子氣了。凱爾莫罕在玩家心理的世外桃源感，就被打碎了。

第二季第一集開始我心情還挺激動的，到了艾斯卡爾便當(dāng)開始覺得不對勁，后面從第五第六集開始多個人物全崩……醉了，編劇說他們改編自小說而不是游戲，那我可以接受人物選角上的各種和游戲沖突的地方，但是小說里也不是這樣的人物性格?。∵@魔改真是讓人不舒服。

前面都還行，最后看的我很痛苦，倒不是因為獵魔人被噶了一大半，而是因為希里這么重要的角色一點成長都沒有，希里跟著獵魔人那么幸苦的訓(xùn)練，她跟杰洛特說她想對過去冷漠的時候我真以為她成長了，但是最后的表現(xiàn)還是那個被困在過去的軟弱要抱抱的公主，外面獵魔人死的死傷的傷最后一起過來呼喚希里，前面杰洛特千呼百喚沒啥用就算了，都到這份上了結(jié)果她轉(zhuǎn)頭對她從來沒見過的爹媽來一句我哪也不去我只要你們簡直是把一路上跟杰洛特和其他獵魔人陪伴的感情揉一塊扔到地上踩兩腳還要吐口唾沫，算是編劇強行要用這個機會來讓葉奈法表現(xiàn)出轉(zhuǎn)變來救場，葉奈法的轉(zhuǎn)變是表現(xiàn)出來了，那希里的呢？順帶一提編劇很用心的把希里快樂跳舞和獵魔人被虐殺的畫面交替在一塊，跟最后一集要表現(xiàn)的“家人”的主題實在是撕裂。還有維瑟米爾，一個獵魔人死掉他都心疼死了，現(xiàn)在在他面前慘死那么多個我都不知道他要怎么撐過去，然而他還是作為編劇的工具人，內(nèi)心的情感與掙扎、希望與絕望被簡單帶過了。至于亞斯卡爾，他這個吊兒郎當(dāng)一點忙都幫不上的形象可能已經(jīng)被編劇用502膠水粘在他身上再拍一百季也甩不掉了。

我真心希望有人能來告訴我我的理解是錯的，片面的，不然看了這個劇我得好久心情都不會好了。