精品亚洲成a人在线|人妻视频免费人人|2021少妇久久久久久久久久久|亚洲日韩片无码中文字幕

<strong id="g78f3"><menu id="g78f3"><strike id="g78f3"></strike></menu></strong>

偉大的安巴遜

劇情片美國1942

主演:約瑟夫·科頓  提姆·霍爾特  多洛雷斯·卡斯特洛  安妮·巴克斯特  阿格妮絲·摩爾海德  

導(dǎo)演:奧遜·威爾斯

 劇照

偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.1偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.2偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.3偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.4偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.5偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.6偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.13偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.14偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.15偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.16偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.17偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.18偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.19偉大的安巴遜 劇照 NO.20
更新時間:2024-04-11 16:54

詳細(xì)劇情

20世紀(jì)初,Amberson家族在當(dāng)?shù)厥且粋€名門望族。年輕人Eugene Morgan(約瑟夫·科頓 Joseph Cotten 飾)苦苦追求Amberson家的Isabel(多洛雷斯·卡斯特洛 Dolores Costello 飾)無果,Isabel最終嫁給了Wilbur Minafer(Donald Dillaway 飾演),兩人生下兒子George(提姆·霍爾特 Tim Holt 飾)。George在父母的溺愛下長大,從小就是個驕橫的孩子,長大后更是變本加厲。從大學(xué)回家的George遇到了來他們家做客的Eugene Morgan,此時的Morgan已是一個在研究動力車的人,他的妻子去世,留給他一個女兒Lucy(安妮·巴克斯特 Anne Baxter)。George愛上了Lucy,而George的姑姑似乎也對Morgan青睞有加。不久George... (展開全部)   20世紀(jì)初,Amberson家族在當(dāng)?shù)厥且粋€名門望族。年輕人Eugene Morgan(約瑟夫·科頓 Joseph Cotten 飾)苦苦追求Amberson家的Isabel(多洛雷斯·卡斯特洛 Dolores Costello 飾)無果,Isabel最終嫁給了Wilbur Minafer(Donald Dillaway 飾演),兩人生下兒子George(提姆·霍爾特 Tim Holt 飾)。George在父母的溺愛下長大,從小就是個驕橫的孩子,長大后更是變本加厲。從大學(xué)回家的George遇到了來他們家做客的Eugene Morgan,此時的Morgan已是一個在研究動力車的人,他的妻子去世,留給他一個女兒Lucy(安妮·巴克斯特 Anne Baxter)。George愛上了Lucy,而George的姑姑似乎也對Morgan青睞有加。不久George的父親去世了,George開始在Amberson家族里當(dāng)家做主。他聽聞了Morgan和他母親的一些傳聞,嚴(yán)厲阻止了其發(fā)展,并帶著他的母親去歐洲旅游。而Morgan的汽車研究正在不斷壯大,卻遭到了George的輕視。無視社會發(fā)展的George正在隨著Amberson家族的沒落而漸漸失去了他原有的一切......

 長篇影評

 1 ) 段落鏡頭斷了氣

如果說對奧森·威爾斯的景深攝影和段落鏡頭的褒揚(yáng)已經(jīng)成了一種cliché,那么我們或許應(yīng)該談?wù)勊膫ゴ髣?chuàng)舉如是如何在這部影片中沉淪的(不去討論所謂的完整版究竟如何);以及從中我們還可以得到些什么。

于我而言,最為精彩的是影片的開頭。旁白徐徐引入,從“那個時候”起筆,談著馬車、服飾:

“因?yàn)槲覀冊诼飞匣ǖ臅r間愈少,節(jié)省下的時間就愈多。但是在那些日子里,時間有的是……”

這是一個文學(xué)時刻,它會讓你想起普魯斯特,想起曹雪芹,會讓你產(chǎn)生一種眷戀的幻覺,這種開頭便產(chǎn)生的幻覺使我后面幾乎要把奧森·威爾斯的旁白當(dāng)成是喬治的回溯。

同時,在旁白與影像間又充滿了張力,這宏大的開頭伴隨著的不是花團(tuán)錦簇的宴會(當(dāng)然,這舞會在后面便會出現(xiàn)),而是“無關(guān)緊要”的影像:全景中的宅子和馬車看起來都是如此普通,若不是后面“群眾”的議論,我們幾乎感受不到這個家族如何magnificent. 而那一段充滿逗樂趣味的換裝蒙太奇中,主角也非安巴遜家族的人,而是摩根。但我們將摩根理解為這個影片真正的主角也未嘗不可。

插句嘴,重看《公民凱恩》的時候,我才忽然被科頓給迷住了。豆瓣影人介紹寫得太好了:

約瑟夫·科頓是那種永遠(yuǎn)成不了天皇巨星、進(jìn)不了前10名但卻也令人永遠(yuǎn)無法忘懷的演員,他就靠在那里吸著煙,溫情而饒有意味地用眼角余光看著你,像一座醞釀爆發(fā)的休眠火山,你不知道什么時候會爆發(fā),一旦爆發(fā),你會心甘情愿被他灼人的熱能所熔化。

他的眼睛里充滿憂郁,笑起來的時候卻意味深長;他有時候看起來有點(diǎn)兒玩世不恭,有時候又從容得有點(diǎn)淡漠。因此他來扮演這部電影中的摩根先生真是太好了。作為踏上工業(yè)革命洪流的新興階級,摩根先生在這卻并不全然作為這個古老的、逐漸衰敗的家族的對立者。相反,他把對伊莎貝拉的愛演繹得足夠壓抑而深沉。這份綿延的感情自然但得起氣韻悠長的鏡頭與敘事,然而卻被硬生生地掐斷了。留下屬于這段感情的動人時刻僅有兩處:舞會上眾人談笑風(fēng)生間,看似落花流水、前嫌盡釋,殊不知此情彌深,卻掩做無意;彌留之際的伊莎貝拉用最后的力氣問到“他問起我了嗎”“他來了嗎”“我想見他”。

重逢最為致命。上一代的重逢是下一代的相遇,而下一代的別離則預(yù)示了重復(fù)之日這個古老家族的衰敗。邁向工業(yè)現(xiàn)代化,邁向自食其力的資本主義精神的女兒與耽于富貴,厭惡勞作的貴族公子,勢必踏上不同道路。而在時代的滾滾紅塵中,我們還是能夠看到一個令人心碎的動情時刻。

街上偶遇的喬治憂心忡忡地抱怨著笑靨如花的露西,“我真不喜歡你這樣的語氣。我不吃把藥就要昏倒了。”

露西則用最為天真活潑語調(diào)與他扯著玩笑話。喬治要與母親離開,永別之際,他為露西的“沒心沒肺”感到痛心,感覺自己像個傻瓜。然而攝影機(jī)隨后為我們揭露了真相。中景鏡頭里我們看著喬治心灰意冷地離去,直到他走出畫外那一刻,我們清楚看到孤身一人在鏡頭中的露西臉色一變,隨即一個臉部特寫,這個幾乎一閃而過的特寫如一記重錘砸在觀眾心中。然后我們看著她走進(jìn)店鋪,要一把藥片和一大杯水,這時候的鏡頭狡猾地跟隨著去拿藥的店主,然后在他回首的瞬間,我們通過他錯愕的、看向地面的眼神知曉了畫外發(fā)生的一切。這一段落結(jié)束了,它或許不像其他有著華麗燈光與精細(xì)布局的段落鏡頭那樣突出,可是卻如此迷人。它與前面喬治的話產(chǎn)生著呼應(yīng),又用畫外留足了想象呼吸的空間。

然而,正是這兩代四人的糾葛本可以譜寫出一段蕩氣回腸的時代戀歌,最終卻成為片段的堆疊。

舞會片段+雪地馬車片段+喬治與姑姑的廚房片段……盡管在各個片段中亦有令人稱贊的鏡頭與調(diào)度,它們卻無法連貫的串起一個完整的敘事?;叵胍幌隆豆駝P恩》吧,在景深鏡頭之外,我們一開始被吸引的難道不是“玫瑰花蕾”的秘密么?我們追隨著記者,不斷在現(xiàn)在與過去中跳躍,影片結(jié)尾,記者串起了凱恩復(fù)雜而荒誕的人生故事,而發(fā)掘出凱恩最深處秘密的是我們。

然而《偉大的安巴遜》,正如我一開始所言,旁白緬懷的語調(diào)像是某人的口述史,影片故事就像他隨意從記憶深處撈起的某段往事,那逝去的歡樂或許帶著幽怨,卻絕非偉大。它固然有動人的時刻,卻缺乏精妙的構(gòu)思,使得這純?nèi)贿^去的講述,但帶著一種“毋庸置疑”的呆板。因此,它不是《追憶似水年華》,不是《紅樓夢》,不是《飄》,不是《家》。它成為了某種略顯空洞的形式。

 2 ) Robert Carringer 的文章

The Magnificent Ambersons

http://www.criterion.com/current/posts/803-the-magnificent-ambersons

If events had turned out differently, The Magnificent Ambersons, Orson Welles’ second film, might well be widely regarded as “the greatest film of all time” rather than Citizen Kane. But in Welles’ absence, RKO Studios recut the original version of the film mercilessly—Welles said it looked like it had been “edited with a lawn mower”—reducing its running time from 131 to the present 88 minutes. Nevertheless, what survives is still one of the most strikingly beautiful and technically innovative films ever to come out of Hollywood. It also tells a good story—about the decline of a once powerful and wealthy turn-of-the-century Midwestern family—with a conviction and maturity that are rare for the old Hollywood system.

It was a well-kept secret that Citizen Kane left Welles so emotionally and creatively exhausted that he was sent away on doctor’s orders to undergo a rest cure. The only surprise in this is that he had managed to hold out for so long. Citizen Kane was the culmination of almost a decade of frenetic energy that included early fame on Broadway and in radio, a short-lived but widely felt revolution in the American theater, the international scandal of the “War of the Worlds” broadcast, and a Hollywood contract that virtually gave him carte blanche. In Kane, at age 25, he had taken on one of the most powerful figures in American public life, publisher William Randolph Hearst, and after the film was made, had had to resist crushing pressures from all sides to get it released.

When he turned to his second film, Welles was in a quieter, more reflective mood. Critics have puzzled over his choice of The Magnificent Ambersons. Perhaps we should see it as an episode of personal stock-taking after a prolonged interval of intense stress. With its strongly autobiographical elements—its setting at the time and place of Welles’ own youth, its brash and arrogant and supremely self-confident young hero, and its obsessive Oedipal concerns—clearly Tarkington’s novel is serving at one level as a means for Welles to delve into his own roots and search out the meaning of his own personal past.

In an earlier, simpler time, how many millions of American boys read Penrod, Booth Tarkington’s modern version of Huckleberry Finn? Welles did, and many other Tarkington works. Tarkington was a regular staple for Welles’ Mercury Theatre radio show, and on the Mercury Theatre broadcast of the novel he called The Magnificent Ambersons, “the truest, cruelest picture of the growth of the Middle West.” At 240 pounds and well over six feet, Welles was wrong for George, Tarkington’s college-boy hero, in the film. In a move that surprised everyone, he selected RKO contract player Tim Holt for the role. (Usually thought of as just a cowboy actor, Holt turned in several notable dramatic performances in his career, most especially in The Magnificent Ambersons and in John Huston’s The Treasure of the Sierra Madre.) For the mother, Welles brought silent star Dolores Costello, one of the great beauties of the 1920s and the former Mrs. John Barrymore, out of retirement. For George’s sweetheart, he selected an unknown starlet Anne Baxter—another inspired choice, as her subsequent career, especially in All About Eve, amply shows. The roster was filled out with Mercury Theatre players who had also been in Citizen Kane—most notably Joseph Cotten, at his most insinuatingly charming, and, unforgettably, Agnes Moorehead, who won the New York Film Critics’ Award for her performance. Although Welles did not appear onscreen himself, he was present in the role he perhaps coveted most—that of the voice-over narrator, intoning Tarkington’s elegant, old-fashioned prose. On the technical side, Bernard Herrmann, another hold-over from Citizen Kane, composed one of his subtlest scores; Stanley Cortez, a relative unknown, as cinematographer was responsible for the astonishingly beautiful lighting of the interior scenes; and veteran art director Mark-Lee Kirk was borrowed from 20th Century Fox to oversee the design and constructionof the Ambersons’ mansion, one of the costliest and most complex sets ever built on a Hollywood sound stage.

Midway through the shooting of The Magnificent Ambersons, Welles was recruited by the U.S. State Department Committee on Inter-American Affairs to make a film in South America as a gestureto promote hemispheric relations inwartime. He rushed Ambersons to completion, entrusting the final editing (according to his close in-tructions) to Robert Wise, another holdover from Citizen Kane, and departed for South America. When the Welles version elicited disastrous results in sneak previews, the RKO regime ordered Wise to recut The Magnificent Ambersons into “releasable” shape. More than 50 minutes of Welles’ footage were removed, and several scenes were rewritten and reshot by others. This radically shortened version was put into release, and the studio ordered all surviving footage from the original version destroyed. Welles was terminated from RKO, and never again in his career was he entrusted with the direction of a major studio feature.

Even in its truncated form, the brilliance of The Magnificent Ambersons is evident. This was demonstrated most strikingly in 1982, when leading international film critics voted it one of the ten greatest films ever made.

 3 ) 劇情翻譯

Eugene Morgan是一個英俊狂野的年輕人。他追求一個上流家庭出身的姑娘Isabel Amberson, 但她卻嫁給了Wilbur Minafer,一個穩(wěn)重?zé)o趣的人。他們的獨(dú)生子George十分受寵。幾年后,Eugene成為了一個成功的汽車生產(chǎn)商,妻子去世了,又回到了故鄉(xiāng)。這時Wilbur已經(jīng)去世,于是Eugene又向Isabel求婚,這一回她答應(yīng)了。但是George卻很討厭Eugene,他和他的姑姑Fanny一起阻止這段戀情,卻帶來了意料之外的災(zāi)難,George也得到報應(yīng)。

 4 ) [Film Review] The Magnificent Ambersons (1942) 7.8/10

A quintessential archetype of the irreconcilable chasm between studio system’s groupthink and individual’s directorial reign in Hollywood, butchered, reshot, and then cobbled together by RKO studio, THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS, the sophomore feature film of Orson Welles, runs about a concise 88 minutes (almost an hour shorter than Welles’ original version, which is allegedly lost forever), bemoans a tampered chef d’oeuvre that should’ve matched the achievement of CITIZEN KANE (1941).

Set in the belle-époque Indianapolise, The Ambersons is the leading patrician household in the city, Major Amberson (Bennett) begets two children, son Jack (Collins) is a bachelor, daughter Isabel (Costello), after getting miffed by the embarrassment of her sweetheart Eugene Morgan (Cotten), marries Wilbur Minafer (Dillaway), a man she doesn’t really love and they have a son George (Holt), who is terribly spoiled by the family as the only offspring, and becomes a terror of the town.

Nearly 20 Years later, George is a young adult and Eugene, now a widower with an eighteen-year-old daughter Lucy (Baxter), meet for the first time in the Amberson’s mansion, George takes an instant liking for a comely and demure Lucy, but instinctively loathes her father, an innovative investor of the new “horseless carriage” technology, auguring the forthcoming era of automobiles. After his father passes away, George’s instinct is validated when Eugene and Isabel prepare to reignite their passion, and George will go out of his way to nip that in the bud, meanwhile, George’s patrilineal aunt, the spinster Fanny Minafer (Moorehead) is also besotted with Eugene and often is submitted to be the laughing stock of George’s cruel tease.

Tracking the downfall of an aristocratic family, Welles makes a monster out of George the whippersnapper, an enfant terrible whose derision of and detachment from the progressive society, whipped up by his insufferable egotism, renders him and his sort an endangered species, the whole town is waiting for George’s comeuppance, which is ironically brought about by his anathema of all things.

Welles’ groundbreaking idiom of deep focus makes a spectacular impression in the interior scenes (namely, the Ambersons’ palatial residence), counterpoised by mesmeric arrangement of chiaroscuro, and Bernard Herrmann’s sonorous score (also mangled and redacted), the film breathes into life by its own pluperfect imagery alone, where the story goes is taken a backseat, especially with such an obdurately unsympathetic character in the center.

The main cast all has his or her moments, Joseph Cotten eloquently withdraws his ire in exchange of an air of gentility that one might deem erring on the side of being nice; silent film star Dolores Costello is so vulnerable in sight that one might even forgive her for cosseting her heir. Anne Baxter elicits a strong presence of poise and dissembled helplessness when facing off a perennially surly Tim Holt, who does justice to the description “the terror of the town”, a brat born of old money, yet has no facility to carry on the torch. But if anything, the most inexcusable crime of this bastardized final product is that it robs Agnes Moorehead her Oscar glory, even in this retrofitted gallimaufry, a high-octane Moorehead holds our attention and buffets our perception of this tale of the undoing with her undying frustration, wrath and despair, a scathing, pulverizing performer that runs rings around all her co-stars. There is no “what if” is real life, one ought to come to terms with being saddled with an inferior art piece and peers into its glamor without being demoralized by its unfortunate alterations, that is as much as a contemporary viewer can do justice to the work per se.

referential entries: Welles’ TOUCH OF EVIL (1958, 8.0/10), THE LADY FROM SHANGHAI (1947, 7.7/10).

 5 ) 【譯】標(biāo)準(zhǔn)收藏公司評《偉大的安巴遜》

【本文首發(fā)于《虹膜》公眾號】

原標(biāo)題:Loving the Ruins; or, DoesThe Magnificent AmbersonsExist?

作者:Jonathan Lethem

譯者:覃天

校對:易二三

來源:《標(biāo)準(zhǔn)收藏》(2018年11月26日)

「加一減一等于零,所以你的意思是說我并無特點(diǎn)嗎?」——伊莎貝爾

「我確確實(shí)實(shí)記得你?!埂獑讨?/span>

「喬治,原來在之前的生活里,你從來沒有認(rèn)識過我?!埂冉?/span>

上世紀(jì)80年代初的某個夜晚,影評人保羅·尼爾森為《偉大的安巴遜》錄制了一個解說視頻,在深夜的電視節(jié)目中向觀眾介紹了這部影片。我被熒幕上的影像深深地吸引了。這到底是怎么回事?我的朋友沉迷于那些長期以來被觀眾忽視的、受損的電影。他推薦我去看未經(jīng)剪輯、更長版本影片,例如霍華德·霍克斯的《紅河》和《烽火彌天》;堅(jiān)持讓我理解邁克爾·西米諾的《天堂之門》是荒謬的,這種共識本身就是荒謬的;執(zhí)意讓我看那些弗里茨·朗還未修復(fù)的《人之欲》和《藍(lán)色梔子》。在保羅·尼爾森看來,奧遜·威爾斯是最神圣的一位電影人,然而彼時嘈雜的電影環(huán)境卻影響著他的崇敬之情,電視里上演的是屠殺、主人公受挫和搶劫故事,而奧遜·威爾斯卻創(chuàng)造出了一個獨(dú)特的夢境。

最終,我們通過錄像帶回溯了威爾斯那些熠熠生輝的作品——《阿卡丁先生》《歷劫佳人》《一切皆真》(暫譯,It’s All True)《麥克白》和《不朽故事》,通過修復(fù),它們的魅力被重新展現(xiàn)在觀眾面前。(當(dāng)我在寫這篇文章的時候,奧遜·威爾斯的遺作《風(fēng)的另一邊》經(jīng)過修復(fù)后,即將上映。)在眾多作品中,只有《偉大的安巴遜》——也許是威爾斯最偉大的一部作品——像一座黑暗中的高樓,從未被修復(fù)過。

《偉大的安巴遜》的主題為何會在觀眾心中激起如此深刻的苦楚?重看此片不僅是為了目睹其精巧結(jié)構(gòu)的步步坍塌,它也反映了安巴遜家族可笑的神話及其脆弱面,他們追求的美國夢不過是一個幻象。世間殘留美好的事物注定會被禿鷹叼走,而這些「禿鷹」可能就是我們自己。觀看影片的過程也就成為了觀眾幻想過去的一種途徑。開頭主角提到,現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)開始時興「沒有馬的馬車」——現(xiàn)代化的汽車,這么一看,安巴遜家族在昔日輝煌世界中的所謂貴族地位,難道不可悲嗎?商業(yè)化帶來的平等主義不也意味著要把他們掃入時代的故紙堆里嗎?我們想從這樣一個悲涼的故事中看到什么呢?正如尤金所說:「逝去的并不是一個年邁的時代,而是一個早已死去的時代。沒有任何時代,只有新的時代?!?/p>

《偉大的安巴遜》既身處在一個死去的時代,又似乎從中抽離。中斷劇情的場景變得越來越多,直到它們顯得有些失真。制片廠最終還是替換了不少影片中的場景,似乎是為了穩(wěn)定電影的美學(xué)基調(diào)。在好萊塢電影中,我們每次都看著一個活生生的人變成鬼魂;我們看著鬼魂穿過豪宅的各個房間,走向一扇打開的窗戶;我們以為至少可以看到鬼魂離開房間,并哀悼它的無形。但是并沒有,觀眾總是看到一半就能猜到結(jié)局,太快了,以至于讓人無法接受;鬼魂們甚至還沒走到窗前就已經(jīng)消失了。但《偉大的安巴遜》卻并非如此,它的獨(dú)特性讓它區(qū)別于那些固化的古典好萊塢作品。

好萊塢電影浮華的「廢墟」永遠(yuǎn)吸引著人們的目光?!秱ゴ蟮陌舶瓦d》的前九分鐘似乎都在為這幅古典繪畫勾勒線條,其中充滿了誘人、尖酸刻薄的敘述,以及群像的表演(這得益于阿格妮絲·摩爾海德、約瑟夫·科頓以及理查德·本內(nèi)特等人的演繹)。所有這些似乎都是對美國社會光輝過去的一種回望。在第九分鐘的時候,隨著安倍遜家族大門的打開,一陣寒風(fēng)吹過,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)自己陷入了更深、更不安的困境。旁白消失了,一場「偉大的、記憶中的舞蹈」緩緩展開。我們跟隨著奧遜·威爾斯的攝影機(jī),沉浸在自己的感知中,被層層對話所迷惑。威爾斯似乎就在我們耳邊輕聲說道:「你想和我一起回到過去嗎?」我們不僅進(jìn)入到了一個過去的世界,還開始了一次對美國黃金時代集體心理學(xué)的研究。我們徜徉在威爾斯的敘述中,既失憶又懷舊。

影片中偉大的舞廳場景(被中間的幾分鐘打斷,但不是致命的)通過諷刺性的旋律層層遞進(jìn),直到它的節(jié)奏逐漸加強(qiáng),我們和角色一起登上樓梯,進(jìn)入不斷升級的黑暗氛圍中。我們現(xiàn)在陷入了喬治愚蠢的行為中,每當(dāng)范妮的狂躁癥發(fā)作,她就會尖叫。她的神經(jīng)質(zhì),在這一幕和之后奶油蛋糕的場景中,甚至包括之后的美國影片中,都前所未有的。(當(dāng)然,《公民凱恩》中的一切也沒有讓觀眾做好準(zhǔn)備。)多年后約翰·卡薩維茨的《面孔》中才出現(xiàn)了這樣的角色。

通過反復(fù)觀看影片,我們知道喬治和芬妮是影片的主要人物。這是一個依靠著「享有特權(quán)的弱者」的報復(fù)行為所驅(qū)動的世界。影片的象征性顯得有些無情,即使這些人物在努力挽回他們對環(huán)境的洞察力:在晚餐聚會的爭論中,尤金悄悄地把他的憤怒發(fā)泄在畫面底端的湯勺上,同時平靜地承認(rèn),汽車的發(fā)明可能是人類文明的一場災(zāi)難。還有哪位導(dǎo)演能像奧遜·威爾斯一樣在《偉大的安巴遜》中那樣對這些角色又愛又恨?他像庫布里克一樣「摧毀」著他們,又像讓·雷諾阿一樣崇拜他們。

《偉大的安巴遜》讓我們無處安身。我們無法懷念這種等級森嚴(yán)、趾高氣揚(yáng)、自封的貴族制度,也不能忍受現(xiàn)代化的生活對過往生活的摧毀。我們和喬治以及范妮分享著相同的心境。尤其是范妮,這個被生活壓垮的「怪物」。她無法得到尤金,沉浸在自己的過去。然而,她也無法忍受自己破壞了尤金和伊莎貝爾的關(guān)系,她讓喬治和自己一起,把假正經(jīng)和偏執(zhí)的憤怒作為武器對付其他人。難怪《偉大的安巴遜》在洛杉磯舉行試映會時,許多觀眾忍受不了這部作品。我想完整、修復(fù)過的《偉大的安巴遜》可能會「毀」了我們所有人。

文章來源://www.criterion.com/current/posts/6065-loving-the-ruins-or-does-the-magnificent-ambersons-exist

 6 ) The Magnificent Ambersons FAQ

http://ambersons.com/FAQs.htm

What is The Magnificent Ambersons about?

The Magnificent Ambersons is about the proud and celebrated Amberson family. The story shows how the family refuses to change with the times, and the subsequent deterioration of the Amberson name as a result.

The story is set in Indianapolis in the late 1800's/early 1900's, and shows how the beauty of a small town was slowly destroyed by the advent of the automobile. A number of dramas carry the movie along. Isabel Amberson is the town beauty and is courted by various beaus, one of whom is the brash and handsome Eugene Morgan. Eugene plans an elaborate serenade for Isabel in front of the Amberson mansion, but makes a fool of himself by falling on his bass viol in a drunken stupor. Eugene tries repeatedly to win Isabel, but she refuses. Even though she is in love with Eugene, the embarrassment from this one incident and the social customs of the time prohibit her from having anything to do with him. Isabel eventually marries Wilbur Minafer, who is less flashy than Eugene, but respectable. Isabel isn't in love with Wilbur, however, and their one child George is incredibly spoiled by Isabel and grows up to be extremely arrogant, righteous and self-absorbed. George has an air of entitlement because he is an Amberson, and has no use for anyone who wants to work for a living. This includes Isabel's true love, Eugene, who left town after losing Isabel. Eugene returns twenty years later with his daughter Lucy, having made his fortune by developing one of the first automobiles. After Wilbur's death, Eugene pursues Isabel again. Wilbur's sister Fanny is also in love with Eugene, though this is not returned by Eugene. Even though Isabel and Eugene are both still in love, their plans are thwarted by George. George hates Eugene not just because of his profession, but because he has to share his mother's attention for the first time. When George learns that the townspeople are talking about Eugene's love for Isabel, George becomes enraged by this supposed scandal and does whatever he can to prevent Isabel and Eugene from marrying. George and Isabel leave on a trip around the world and are gone for five years. Despite Isabel's poor health and longing for Eugene, George insists that they both stay abroad, returning only when Isabel is colse to death. George's attitudes and actions help to ruin his family, as well as his chances of having a relationship with Eugene's daughter Lucy. Eventually George receives his "comeuppance", learning humility after suffering the tragic consequences of his own devices. George reconciles with Lucy, and asks for Eugene's forgiveness. By then all of the members of the Amberson family have either died, moved away or become destitute.

Is this movie based on a book?

Yes. The book The Magnificent Ambersons was written by Booth Tarkington, for which he received the Pulitzer Prize in 1919.

When was this movie made and who directed it?

The movie was released in July 1942 and was directed by Orson Welles. It was his next project after right after Citizen Kane.

I've heard of Citizen Kane, but not The Magnificent Ambersons. Why?

The Magnificent Ambersons was supposed to be as big as if not bigger than Citizen Kane, but many events contributed to this classic becoming an obscure Hollywood memory (see next FAQ). The short explanation is that Ambersons is an artistic film that was not well received by mainstream audiences when it was released, and it just never caught on the same way that other classics do.

What happened to this movie to make it such a tragic piece of Hollywood history?

In its original form Ambersons was 131 minutes long, and was very upbeat for about 45 minutes, afterwhich it took a sudden dramatic turn to become a very sad story without an uplifting ending. Once most of Ambersons was finished, Welles left for Brazil by request of the US State Department to make another film, which was intended to foster relations between the the US and South America (the film was never finished, but would later be released as "It's All True"). The final process of editing was left to the film's editor Robert Wise. There are conflicting reports of what happened next, but a number of scenes were cut, ordered either by RKO or by Welles himself. Either way, the shortened version was previewed at a theater in Pomona, CA, so that audience reaction could be used to make changes if necessary.

The Pomona preview was a disaster. Before Ambersons played, the audience had watched the rousing musical The Fleet's In, so the audience was probably not in the mood for a slow-paced and depressing period piece. Audience members (consisting mostly of teenagers) talked at the picture, kidded it, and laughed at the wrong places. After the film, audience members filled out "comment cards" to express their opinions. While some of the responses praised the film, most of the cards were very negative, with comments like "it stinks", "rubbish", and "a horrible distorted dream". The president of RKO, George Schaefer, was at the preview and wrote to Welles "Never in all my experience in the industry have I taken so much punishment or suffered as I did at the Pomona preview".

At this point RKO had invested over $1,000,000 in a picture that could possibly bomb. The next action was to make more changes and preview it again. Again, there are two different versions of what happened - either some of the original cuts were put back in, or more cuts were made. Either way, another preview was held two days later in Pasadena. This preview was much more favourable, although both audiences had problems with some of the same aspects. The film at this point, while shorter (about 117 minutes), was still relatively intact. Rather than leaving the film alone, however, RKO believed that Ambersons would only appeal to a more mature audience, which was how Pasadena was perceived. Because the largest part of movie revenue would came from the younger crowd, substantial changes would have to be made to make the film shorter and more upbeat. Ideally, Welles would have to be present during this editing process, but since Welles was in South America (and working on another movie), he could only communicate changes by telegram. Attempts to send Robert Wise to Brazil were prevented due to wartime travel restrictions. Correspondence from RKO with detailed changes were sent to Welles, and Welles in return made his own attempts to make changes, to no avail (see below).

It wasn't long before RKO took Ambersons away from Welles completely. Input from a number of studio executives was given to try and save the picture. One in particular that is somewhat amusing was from producer Bryan Foy, who said that the film was "too f*ckin' long", and that forty minutes had to be cut ("just throw all the footage up in the air and grab everything but forty minutes"). Eventually, about 50 minutes was cut from original Ambersons, and some scenes were written and shot by others, all in Welles' absence. Many of the cuts were made to eliminate the more depressing aspects of the film, like how Major Amberson and Fanny had lost their money in bad investments. In addition, the original sad ending was cut and reshot to be more uplifting. The final version, running at about 88 minutes, was released in July to so-so results, and was effectively abandoned by RKO. The film lost over $600,000, an enormous amount for a relatively small studio like RKO.

What happened to Orson Welles as a result of the Ambersons?

Welles was recalled from South America before the filming of "It's All True" was finished and his contract with RKO was terminated. Because of the problems with Ambersons, and the fact that the South American project was scrapped by the new authorities at RKO, Welles developed a reputation for not finishing projects. He was never entrusted with a major Hollywood production again. In Welles own words, "They destroyed Ambersons and it destroyed me." Welles did go on to direct and star in many more pictures, but without the luxuries that he enjoyed at RKO. Welles spent much of his career acting (sometimes in roles that were quite beneath his talent) so that he could raise money to fund his own projects. His next major project as director was Touch of Evil, which was also severely cut prior to release (fortunately, this movie was recently restored).

How did Welles try to save Ambersons during the editing process while he was in South America?

From the time Welles arrived in Rio de Janeiro he was in constant contact with several poeple at RKO. Communication was mostly by telegram, between February and June 1942, with memos between Welles and various people at RKO, including Robert Wise, Jack Moss, Joseph Cotten, and George Schaefer. It's clear from these memos how much of an effect the Pomona preview had on RKO. Welles made several suggestions to try and make Ambersons work, even though he was fully occupied with filming in Rio. Despite his attempts, Welles was to have little influence over the editing process.

Lawrence French, a fellow Ambersons fan, has compiled many of these memos. You can see them here, along with many images from the film. One can only imagine Welles' anger and frustration, knowing what was being done to his work in his absence, not to mention the fact that his standing in Hollywood was now in serious danger.

What are some of the unique aspects of this film that make it (or made it) so special?

Welles definitely wanted to transcend the traditional Hollywood movie, both with Citizen Kane and Ambersons. Welles used a variety of film techniques to achieve his goal. Deep-focus photography, overlapping dialogue, long takes, expressionistic lighting - all were used to make Ambersons a work of art.

1. The Ambersons mansion. This was one of the most elaborate and expensive sets ever built at the time. Incredibly detailed and elegant, it was probably the first movie of its time to give the illusion of being in an actual mansion, allowing multiple rooms and areas to be captured in a single scene.

2. The ballroom sequence. When George returns home for Christmas holiday after his sophomore year at Harvard, his family held a ball in his honour ("the last of the great, long-remembered dances that everybody talked about"). One sequence, which was largely cut from the original, was a continuous series of backward-moving camera shots through four rooms, following different characters as they made their way through the ballroom in the Amberson mansion. Long, continuous shots like this are very unusual, particularly because the large, bulky camera is moving backwards along a circular course. Welles liked long takes, and other long takes are in the film, such as the scene with Fanny, George and Uncle Jack in the Amberson kitchen.

3. The sleighride. The morning after the ball, most of the Ambersons go out for a ride in Eugene's horseless carriage. The sleighride is one of the most unique sequences in film, and fortunately this scene was left relatively intact (see below). To make this scene as realistic as possible, a soundstage was set up in an icehouse called the Union Ice Company, which was in downtown Los Angeles. This icehouse allowed a more authentic recreation of an outdoor winter scene, with real snow and visible breath from the actors. The quality of the dialogue recorded at the icehouse wasn't suitable, however, so the actors re-recorded their lines on the RKO roof, sitting on planks that were being rocked up and down. This simulated the bouncing motion of Eugene's automobile, so that the vibration of their voices could be picked up. While the result is truly exceptional, the filming was technically demanding and put the film behind schedule. As well, Ray Collins, who played Uncle Jack Amberson, contracted pneumonia and was out for ten days.

4. Major Amberson's speech. Shortly after Isabel's death, Major Amberson sits alone in front of a fire and ponders the origins of life. This is often cited as one of the most beautiful scenes in the film. While Welles narrates, the light from the flickering fire illuminates the Major's bemused face, while he struggles to understand what life is about. The scene fades away, and there is no further mention of the Major, and the assumption is that he has died. In the original version, the Major continues to wonder aloud. George asks him if he wants a glass of water. The Major responds "No -- no, I-I don't want anything at all. I wish somebody could tell me..." The scene then dissolves to two tombstones, Isabel's and the Major's. This obviously would have been much more powerful and less confusing than the edited version, and presumably was cut because it came shortly after Isabel's death and increased the sadness of the film.

So, if this is such a great movie, why did it bomb?

Welles blamed the failure of Ambersons on RKO, since they were responsible for cutting so much of the film. However, it seems just as possible that Ambersons was just not that interesting to a general audience. Understandably, audiences in WWII America were more interested in musicals, comedies and patriotic fare than they were in some depressing period drama. If the original version existed, it would likely be hailed today as a masterpiece, much the same as Citizen Kane. And Ambersons didn't entirely bomb, since it was nominated for 4 Academy Awards including best picture. As well, Agnes Moorehead won the New York Film Critic's award for her role as Aunt Fanny.

Has anyone ever found the missing Ambersons footage?

No. The cut footage was kept in film vaults for a few months, and was eventually burned due to a shortage of storage space. There are lots of stills from the cut footage, and the movie trailer (which is on the VHS tape from Turner Classic Movies) has a few seconds of film that isn't in the movie.

The January 2002 issue of Vanity Fair magazine has a great article on Ambersons, including interviews with several people who have tried unsuccessfully to find the original version, both in the US and South America. Although no one can say for sure that the missing footage no longer exists, the take-home message of the article is that it's gone for good.

What was the original ending to the Ambersons?

In the original ending, after Eugene hears that George is in the hospital after being hit by an automobile, Eugene goes to visit Fanny in the cheap boardinghouse where she and George now live. Eugene is rich and successful, and Fanny now lives in poverty, having once enjoyed the luxury of the Amberson mansion. Eugene seems completely oblivious to Fanny's plight, and instead tells Fanny about his visit to see George in the hospital, and how George asked for his forgiveness, and that Lucy believes that she and George will get married. During this time Fanny is seated and rocking back and forth in squeaky rocking chair, while a silly vaudeville record plays in the background, and a variety of old maids play cards and listen in curiously. While Eugene talks, Fanny responds unemotionally. There is nothing between them anymore, and she has given up on the possibility that Eugene may finally show some romantic interest in her. Eugene finally adds that he could sense Isabel's presence in the hospital room, and that through him she had brought George under shelter again, and that he had been true at last to his true love. Eugene then says goodbye, leaves and the movie ends.

While there is some closure in this ending, the lingering effect is that of the destitute and lonely Fanny. Welles believed this to be the best scene in the movie, and said that it was about "the deterioration of personality, the way people diminish with age, and particularly with impecunious old age". This was the final reminder of the end of the great Amberson era.

The original ending was reshot and shows Eugene and Fanny at the hospital. Eugene's dialogue is about the same, but after Eugene tells Fanny about Isabel's presence in the room, Fanny beams with joy and she and Eugene walk away, accompanied by a great swell of happy music. Everyone is going to be OK.

What was the Mercury Theatre?

The Mercury Theatre was a theatrical producing company formed in 1937 by Orson Welles and John Houseman. By then Welles was already an accomplished radio personality, with his intense dramatic sensibilities and mellifluous voice. The Mercury employed many personalities who would work with Welles in film, including Agnes Moorehead, Ray Collins, Joseph Cotten, and Bernard Herrmann. In 1938 the Mercury produced a radio series called Mercury Theatre on the Air, which dramatized great novels (including Ambersons) and Shakespearean plays. The series was most famous for their 1938 radio broadcast of H.G. Wells' War of the Worlds. Because of the considerable attention and notoriety that Welles received from this broadcast, the Mercury Theatre on the Air became The Campbell Playhouse (after being sponsored by the Campbell's Soup Company). In 1939 Welles and Houseman signed a contract with RKO, and The Mercury Theatre soon moved to Hollywood to make Citizen Kane and The Magnificent Ambersons.

Is Ambersons available on video or DVD?

There have been several VHS releases of Ambersons (same movie, different distributor). Some of these are available on amazon.com. After years of waiting, the Region 1 (North American) Ambersons DVD is finally available, but only as part of the Citizen Kane 70th Anniversary Collectors Edition Blu-ray set. At this point this set is available exclusively on amazon.com. There are several Region 2 DVD releases - French, Japanese, German, British, and Spanish. The German DVD (Der Glanz des Hauses Amberson) is available from Kinowelt Home Entertainment. I can't attest to the quality of this DVD, although the website dvdscan.com gave it a poor review. The French DVD comes with some extras, including excerpts from This is Orson Welles, and a booklet with Ambersons information, all in a large collectible box. This DVD is available from amazon.fr. The best version of Ambersons that I've seen is the Criterion laserdisc, which also comes with a wealth of extras. The laserdisc is out of print but is frequently for sale on eBay. For more information on Ambersons video availability, as well as a comparison of the French and Japanese DVDs, go to Wellesnet.com, a great Orson Welles resource.

Where can I read more about the Ambersons?

The most complete reference is Robert L. Carringer's book The Magnificent Ambersons - A Reconstruction. This book describes the history of the making and undoing of the Ambersons. This is also the only book that has all of the dialogue from the original 131 minute version of the Ambersons, as well as various storyboards, sketches, stills from the lost footage, and the complicated details of the editing process and Welles futile attempts to influence it from South America. Even with just the script, the intense sadness of the original ending with Fanny and Eugene in the boarding house is heartbreaking. Another book by the same author is The Making of Citizen Kane, which has a short but detailed chapter on Ambersons.

Another terrific reference is This Is Orson Welles by Orson Welles and Peter Bogdonavich. This book has a condensed version of the original script, as well as excellent conversations between Welles and Bogdonavich about Ambersons. This is also a great book for anyone who wants to know more about Welles' other movies and his life after Ambersons.

BFI Film Classics The Magnificent Ambersons by V.F. Perkins. This book also has a description and analysis of the Ambersons, much like the Carringer book but without the script.

 

 短評

給我是威爾斯的話當(dāng)年早跟萬惡的片商拚了!超過一半時長被強(qiáng)行剪掉,整齣電影基本是以肢離破碎的面貌示人!本來我還陶醉於威爾斯優(yōu)雅大氣的長鏡頭及深焦攝影,可惜往後卻因劇情殘缺而越看越糊塗

8分鐘前
  • 百年孤寂
  • 還行

Another Hamlet Story. 剪刀無處不在,Orson Welles的口述飽含諷刺

11分鐘前
  • Lies and lies
  • 推薦

原版到底是個啥樣啊

14分鐘前
  • 暗黑4出了嗎
  • 還行

本片提名奧斯卡最佳女配角和最佳影片等獎項(xiàng)

19分鐘前
  • (????д????)
  • 還行

原著小說作者是WELLES一家的朋友,這也是為什么ORSON WELLES想改編這部作品的原因之一。另外ORSON WELLES也一直懷疑里面GERGOE這個角色是以他為原型的,因?yàn)樗娜徒凶鯣EORGE ORSONWELES(喬治-奧森-威爾斯)。

23分鐘前
  • 祥雪
  • 力薦

2012/12/17想看,是因?yàn)閿z影還是什么?故事就是一個富二代熊孩子作死,要是沒有最后幾分鐘結(jié)局就太解氣了。剪成這樣還是可以看到與眾不同的氣質(zhì)的,畢竟那時候好萊塢這種描繪家族畫卷感的時代劇很罕見。

24分鐘前
  • \t^h/
  • 還行

外人拍攝的結(jié)尾不評價,但這可能是最黑暗肅殺的情節(jié)劇了,威爾斯在《凱恩》后似乎有意放慢腳步,以內(nèi)化的人物關(guān)系展現(xiàn)背叛和時代變遷,即使被片廠刪減大半依舊能看到威爾斯更進(jìn)一步的調(diào)度與情緒。

26分鐘前
  • TWY
  • 推薦

原來新浪潮好幾部電影最后制作人員和演員表用念的就是從這部里學(xué)的威爾森?。「駝P恩差不多都是自傳吧,但這部有點(diǎn)點(diǎn)無聊呃。威爾森完全是菲茲杰拉德式的導(dǎo)演,或許他是最適合拍菲茲傳記的人了吧,可惜沒有,舊時光已死。

27分鐘前
  • 還行

the first montage sequence is very impressive

30分鐘前
  • 蔥油餅
  • 推薦

那么瘋狂的買下來,放了3年才看...

35分鐘前
  • UrthónaD'Mors
  • 還行

奧遜·威爾斯第二作,因?yàn)楸焕纂娙A剝奪終剪權(quán),目前只遺留下88分鐘版本,不過,私以為現(xiàn)在能看到的版本也沒什么大問題,稍許留白、混亂和破碎并未折損它的凄美,反而更契合于影片所呈現(xiàn)的家族沒落——再盛大的輝煌,最終也不過是過眼云煙,徒留歷史的碎片殘存于世。貴族階級的衰亡(富不過三代)與現(xiàn)代工業(yè)家的興起(寄生繼承vs.白手起家),自私、傲慢、戀母而游手好閑的末代公子,為了孩子和家族犧牲個人幸福的女性,還有終身不渝、或隱秘或公開、最終卻只能停留于念想的愛情。影片的深焦攝影與運(yùn)動長鏡成效卓著,而且毫無炫技或喧賓奪主之感,形式和內(nèi)容已經(jīng)融為一體,不可分離。(8.5/10)

37分鐘前
  • 冰紅深藍(lán)
  • 推薦

窺見一斑,可惜是88分鐘的

38分鐘前
  • 甘草披薩
  • 推薦

看的88分鐘版明顯不會是導(dǎo)演剪的版本,期望能看到148分鐘的初始版

39分鐘前
  • 藍(lán)翼
  • 推薦

俄狄浦斯的小男孩不需要愛情。開頭真是好“那時候鎮(zhèn)上所有的女人都互相認(rèn)識,每個家庭都互相認(rèn)識彼此的馬車”女人穿戴項(xiàng)鏈和手鐲,男人帶著各式帽子,褲子絕不能起皺,反正他們有的是時間。后半程斷斷續(xù)續(xù)被剪得不知所云了,像這場工業(yè)革命一樣的快,趕著時間將安倍遜的輝煌和大宅一起丟進(jìn)逝去的時代。

43分鐘前
  • Aby
  • 還行

這個版本呈現(xiàn)出來的內(nèi)容,不足以支撐威爾斯喜歡的宏大敘事,這恐怕不光是剪輯的問題。

47分鐘前
  • 蘇莫
  • 還行

奧森·威爾斯的第二部影片,由布斯.塔金頓的同名小說改編而成,描繪安伯遜家族的興衰史,并以男主角介入安伯遜家族母子之間后,牽扯出一連串愛恨情仇的故事作為主軸。這部“剪得支離破碎的杰作”仍在電影史上和威爾斯的作品中占有一席不容忽視的地位,被普遍認(rèn)為是僅次于《公民凱恩》的“準(zhǔn)杰作”。

50分鐘前
  • stknight
  • 推薦

88分版劇情太濃縮不能很當(dāng)真,倒是把注意力都收到電影語言了。安家人經(jīng)?;\罩在陰影里不惜讓你看不清臉,室內(nèi)拍得嗲。長鏡頭一堆,從一樓大廳一路搖到三樓那個,炫技派~

51分鐘前
  • paradiso
  • 還行

剪切略混亂,人物造型很精致

55分鐘前
  • 泰坦
  • 還行

非常不威爾斯的一部片,說教又happy ending。唯幾個場景的運(yùn)鏡看出威爾斯的靈魂。另外這個88分鐘的版本是不是剪亂了,節(jié)奏很跳躍。

59分鐘前
  • scaryzion
  • 還行

果然支離破碎,從碎片推斷其原有面目的盛大輝煌。

1小時前
  • 歡樂分裂
  • 推薦

返回首頁返回頂部

Copyright ? 2024 All Rights Reserved