超多的面部特寫，高顏值的演員，鑲金嵌寶的服裝，氣勢(shì)恢宏的音樂，外景鏡頭非?？季?。演伊凡的演員擺POSE的技能逆天了，笑點(diǎn)是俄羅斯的宮殿門象狗洞，人人得以彎腰側(cè)身通過，直到最后皇嬸策劃教堂行刺時(shí)我才發(fā)現(xiàn)皇帝的這個(gè)親屬是女的。

日丹諾夫說愛森斯坦把伊凡雷帝塑造了一個(gè)神經(jīng)衰弱的人。而斯大林認(rèn)為：伊凡雷帝是一個(gè)極其殘酷的人，表現(xiàn)他的殘酷是可以的。但應(yīng)當(dāng)說明為什么要?dú)埧?。伊凡雷帝的一個(gè)錯(cuò)誤就是沒有徹底鏟除五大封建家族。如果他消滅了這五大家族，那就根本不會(huì)出現(xiàn)混亂時(shí)期了。而伊凡雷帝不管是處死誰，過后總是后悔不已，懺悔個(gè)沒完。在這方面妨礙他的是上帝。應(yīng)當(dāng)更果斷一些。

斯大林說：你們把沙皇演成了一個(gè)優(yōu)柔寡斷的人，就像是哈姆雷特?？偸莿e人告訴他應(yīng)當(dāng)做什么。而不是他自己作出決定。 沙皇伊凡是一個(gè)偉大而英明的統(tǒng)治者，如果把他同路易十一作比較（你們讀過有關(guān)路易十一為路易十四奠定專制制度基礎(chǔ)的書嗎？），那么伊凡雷帝同路易簡直不可同日而語。伊凡雷帝的英明之處在于，他始終站在民族的立場(chǎng)上，不允許外國人進(jìn)入自己的國家，從而防止了外來影響向國內(nèi)滲透。

Eisenstein’s two-part historical biopic of Ivan IV of Russia (1530-1584), it is his swan song, commissioned by none other than Joseph Stalin himself. Intended as a trilogy, the project’s third installment was scrapped after Part II enraged Stalin (why? the behind-the-scene stories are destined to be more appealing than the actual films) and was subsequently banned, which only came out of the woodwork in 1958, 10 years after Eisenstein’s death, and 5 years after Stalin’s.

Viewed today, this two features are testaments to Eisenstein’s absolute geniuses in filmmaking, shot when the Soviet Union took a heavy toll of WWII, he must contend with limited funds and resources to map out such a juggernaut of an enterprise. You can call the eventual fruit ahistorical or irreverent, but not unimpressive, and we can see on the screen where Eisentein splashes out, it is not in the battlefield action, or exterior settings (both are condensed to a minimum, and Part II is essentially a chamber piece, which never ventures into the open), but in the fineries and decors on display, those lavishing costumes (head gears, silk robes, ruffs galore!) are kaleidoscopic with their intricate designs and characteristic patterns, in Part II, when primitive colorization is applied to the revelry sequences, you are able to gape at the fabric’s original texture and chroma, in a word, you must trust a gay man’s dress sense, that is a given.

Technically, Eisenstein is a maestro of shadow play, which is amazingly deployed to parallel the power shifting between Ivan, the founder of Tsardom of Muscovy, who unites the country and the discontent Russian boyars, their schism lies in whether power should be autocratic or shared by those selected few. Ivan’s strongest ally is the masses, and his anti-clerical disposition is emphatically validated by the Eastern Orthodox Church’s callousness. It is not difficult to understand why Stalin personally identified himself with Ivan the ruler.

Also facial expressions has never been so vividly recorded like this, Eisenstein’s close-ups are highly theatrical under the lighting’s manipulation, and sometimes, bolstered by dramatically contrasted compositions. Those faces are mannered but expressive, to register one single emotion (frowning, glowering, darting, staring) at a time. Their purposefulness conveys a heaviness as if those characters are driven by monomania, the expressions don’t belong to real humans, but tableaux vivants heightened in emotionality, to ram their significations down our throats. All I can say is, it is an approach of expression, one man’s meat can be another man’s poison though.

Performance-wise, the cast is superb, despite their method is obsolete. An aquiline Nikolay Cherkasov reigns over the titular role with both flair and variation, his Ivan isn’t defined merely by “terrible”, if you get the preconception that Ivan is a despot, which the films certainly do not concur with, Ivan is an orphan with a grudge, he is ruthless, nearly paranoid, but before that, he has also been consumed by loneliness, betrayal and bereavement (the allegiance test when he is apparently in extremis is a high point in Part I), Cherkasov downplays Ivan’s menace, but highlights his self-importance and grandstanding comportment, and on a minor note of the heavy makeup, how funny his mustache seems to grow out of his nostrils.

Among the secondary players, Lyudmila Tselikovskaya is a beatific Tsarina Anastasia in Part I; Mikhail Zharov, as Malyuta Skuratov, Ivan’s foe-to-friend crony, is remarkable for his canine wiles, especially in Part II; and Mikhail Nazvanov makes Prince Andrew Kurbsky a contradiction of wills and desires, he can look stupid but act not so, or otherwise, there is glint in his eyes, which can be easily lost with all the bloviating, orating and speechifying. Then, a dazed, namby-pamby Pavel Kadochnikov makes Vladimir of Staritsa (Ivan’s cousin) a competent fool, the prototype of a mommy’s boy, but surprisingly, free of mockery, when he is struck down, you just feel sorry for him, accursed by his blue blood. Lastly, as Vladimir’s mother and Ivan’s aunt, Efrosinia of Staritsa, the arch-villain, Serafima Birman is terrific in both films, her saturnine venom is spilt all over the screen, but when she chants, it is also weirdly affecting, almost facetious, yes, credit also should be accorded to Prokofiev’s grand, emotive score, it helps to hold the whole nine yard together, and cues you to adjust the gravity quotient, aka. how serious the matter you are watching means to be.

While both films are equally eloquent and uniformly reflect Eisenstein’s mastery, Part II has a slight edge with the colored segments that grant you a taste of what he can do with colors, and it is mad as hell, oversaturated and kinetic, as if you were spelunking in the hellmouth, these two films are revelations, even if you are not particularly into that aforementioned approach, Eisenstein is always a veritable force to be reckoned with.

referential entries: Eisenstein’s BATTLESHIP POTEMKIN (1925, 8.4/10); Laurence Olivier’s HAMLET (1948, 8.3/10); Mikhail Kalatozov’s THE CRANES ARE FLYING (1957, 8.6/10).

English Title: Ivan the Terrible, Part I

Original Title: Ivan Groznyy

Year: 1944

Country: Soviet Union

Language: Russian

Genre: Biography, Drama, History

Director/Screenwriter/Editing: Sergei M. Eisenstein

Music: Sergei Prokofiev

Cinematography: Andrey Moskvin, Eduard Tisse

Cast:

Nikolay Cherkasov

Lyudmila Tselikovskaya

Serafima Birman

Mikhail Nazvanov

Mikhail Zharov

Amvrosi Buchma

Mikhail Kuznetsov

Pavel Kadochnikov

Andrei Abrikosov

Aleksandr Mgebrov

Rating: 8.1/10

English Title: Ivan the Terrible, Part II

Original Title: Ivan Groznyy. Skaz vtoroy: Boyarskiy zagovor

Year: 1958

Country: Soviet Union

Language: Russian

Genre: Biography, History

Director/Screenwriter: Sergei M. Eisenstein

Music: Sergei Prokofiev

Cinematography: Andrey Moskvin, Eduard Tisse

Editing: Esfir Tobak

Cast:

Nikolay Cherkasov

Serafima Birman

Pavel Kadochnikov

Mikhail Zharov

Amvrosi Buchma

Mikhail Kuznetsov

Andrei Abrikosov

Aleksandr Mgebrov

Mikhail Nazvanov

Vladimir Balashov

Vsevolod Pudovkin

Pavel Massalsky

Ada Vojtsik

Rating: 8.2/10